Participants do not drive after drinking ♦ a perspective that considers interlock programs as more than the device itselfīut rather as a coordinated set of activities designed to ensure that program It is recommended that interlock programs incorporate the following key elements: There is a need to enhance rehabilitation services and related programs available ♦ To reduce the likelihood of recidivism once the interlock has been removed, ♦ Once removed, recidivism rates are comparable among interlock participants Participants, at least so long as the interlock is in the vehicle. Have DWI recidivism rates that are as much as 90% lower than among non. ♦ Evaluations of interlock programs consistently report that interlock participants Too much alcohol and prevent them from operating the vehicle. Interlock system that is able to reliably identify individuals who have consumed Research and experience have contributed to the development of an ♦ Alcohol Interlock technology has advanced considerably over the past several Providers and manufacturers met in Montreal to discuss the current state of the ♦ To identify best practices, a group of researchers, policy makers, service On alcohol interlock programs as well as guidelines on best practices for such ♦ The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive source of information ♦ Recent legislation in both Canada and the United States has heightened interest That has created interlock programs for DWI offenders.

♦ As a consequence, many jurisdictions in North America have enacted legislation ♦ The alcohol interlock has been proven effective in reducing drinking and driving

Download interlok device drivers free